![]() |
Kyaw Thu Carries a coffin during 100,000th funeral service organized by the FFSS (Reuters) Published: by DVB on 17 May 2011 |
Former actor and film director Kyaw Thu is a two-time winner of
the Myanmar Academy Award, and during the 1980s and 1990s, one of
Burmese cinema’s leading men. Since his arrest in 2007 for offering food
to monks during the Saffron Revolution, he has been banned from the
film world. Yet in the four years since, he has emerged as one of the
Burmese government’s most outspoken critics, and now runs the
Rangoon-based Free Funeral Service Society (FFSS).
What ways are left for you to express yourself as an artist after the bans that have been imposed on you?
Being an artist, I have to be creating art for my own mental
wellbeing. Now I am painting in my free time and writing some articles.
The articles I’m writing are not about entertainment but about my
experiences in charity work, about the hardships the people are facing
and our work in assisting them.
You lived about two-thirds of your lifetime as an artist and film star. How did you feel when you are banned from this?
I’m a film actor and director. So I felt very emotional when I
was banned from acting and directing. But before I was banned in 2007, I
could only come to [the FFSS office] in the morning before I went to
shoot and then come back in the evening when the shooting is done. I
could only devote part of my time for the [charity] work. But now, I’m
in the office by 6:30-7am in the morning and stay there until 4-5pm in
the afternoon – I can fully devote all my time to serve the people so in
a way I get a chance to return my thanks to my audience and fans. For
that, I’m thankful [to the government] for banning me.
Do you find much difference between your life as an artist and as a charity worker?
During my life as an entertainer, with my images on the silver
screen, I had to make people emotional; make them feel happy, angry and
sad through my performance. For that, I saw performing entertainment
induces bad karma in a way. But now, I am doing all my best to give
necessary help and solve problems for the people – give them a helping
hand. I’m now working in the field close to the people, offering them
help and assistance, and I take this as making merit.
Why does the Burmese government jail artists and public figures who respond to humanitarian issues or crises?
We artists and entertainers are regarded as the country’s role
models and the people tend to admire and follow what we do. We have to
show devotion to religion and charity work so the people will take heed
from us and follow this path. It is very inhumane to ban entertainers
who do charity work and offer meals to monks for their religious beliefs
[referring to his meal offering to monks at Shwedagon Pagoda in the
September 2007 protests].
Can one be a good artist in Burma in its present political state and not be politically engaged or involved?
I think that an artist who doesn’t want to deal with charity
work and politics [in a country like Burma] has to be an egoist. An
egoist will only focus on his ego and how to make money, and those
people are taking the path to hell. In my opinion, an artist or
entertainer, along with creating art, should also do charity work and
engage in politics because it is a direct concern for the people. But
when we say we are active in civil society and politics, it doesn’t mean
that we are setting up a party and looking to become the country’s
leaders. But I think [the regime] worried that we would form a party and
steal their power, and this is why they are imposing restrictions and
arresting people like us.
Why did you decide to start the Free Funeral Service Society?
It was started by U Thukha [late influential film director and
public figure]. I saw that back then [about 10 years ago] there was no
Burmese [Buddhist] group working to assist funerals but there were
groups among the Christian, Muslim and Hindu communities that did that.
So we came up with this idea to set up a group to assist [Buddhist]
funerals. As we progressed with it, we started offering medical
assistance for the poor because, through our funeral work, we found that
people were dying unnecessarily due to lack of money, medicine and
health assistance. From that, we are now stepping up to providing free
education as well because due to the lack of education, people often
don’t know which medicine to take. Also, we found that most people have
poor English language skills – that includes myself as well. We are now
providing children with education courses focusing on the English
language.
Is there any cinema in Burma that has confronted
political realities and that would present a valuable picture of the
struggles in Burma to the outside world?
I don’t think we will ever get to that stage of freedom. I have
been banned for over three years. During the interrogations before my
release [from several days in detention following the September
incident], the police chief told me they wanted to see me only doing my
charity and entertainment work. But then, when I came out, I was banned
from doing entertainment work and it wasn’t even an official order –
they just told me [verbally] that I can no longer take part in films.
What pressures do you now face as a charity worker?
In my charity work, I am hindered from contributing to society.
Now I can’t go and visit my son and my daughter who are living abroad
because my passport expired about two years ago, and when I tried to
extend it, authorities said I needed approval from the Film Association.
When I went to the Association, they denied me approval. Recently, I
went to [immigration] again and told them it would be impossible for me
to get approval from the Film Association as I am no long an actor and
haven’t done any films for over three years. Then, they asked me to get a
certificate from the Association acknowledging that I am no longer an
actor.
Are you hopeful that things will improve in Burma?
Even someone like me who is not in the prison is heavily
restricted from going where I want – I can’t even see my children and my
grandchild. We are just entertainers and we never raised our fists and
rebelled against the government, but were simply just offering meals to
monks. It is a very ugly thing to do put restrictions upon us according
to their laws. This is an embarrassing thing for our country in the eyes
of the international community. I’m not holding high hopes now but am
just doing what I can. About two years ago, a leader in the government
told me: “Ko Kyaw Thu, don’t raise your voice,” basically warning me not
to raise issues via the foreign media. I replied to him saying:
“General, it doesn’t matter who is ruling our country or acting as the
government, but I will still be organising funerals… and still be
raising my voice against wrongdoing.”
copy from DVB
No comments:
Post a Comment